ARTICLE GUIDE
At a Glance
This study considers early Islamic origins and textual transmission through critical realism and material evidence. Its introduction contrasts manuscript, inscriptional, and geographical arguments with the author’s account of the Bible’s progressive covenantal unity.
How should historical artifacts be weighed against later accounts of religious origins?
This guide introduces the argument developed in the complete article and its main lines of investigation.
Key Claims
- The available introduction frames critical realism as a method for testing competing historical explanations.
- The study surveys arguments concerning inscriptions, prayer direction, the Ṣanʿāʾ palimpsest, and manuscript corrections.
- It identifies disagreements between revisionist and moderate historical models and notes limitations of geographical arguments.
- The author contrasts inlibration with revelation centered on the incarnate Word.
- Biblical canonical unity is presented through the promise-plan while retaining Israel’s continuing vocation.
Primary Textual Anchors
- Genesis 3:15; Jeremiah 31:31–34; Ezekiel 36:26–27
- John 1:14
- Romans 11:17–29
Scripture Connections
Genesis 3:15; Jeremiah 31:31–34; Ezekiel 36:26–27; John 1:14; Romans 11:17–29
Related Guides
- Epigraphy, Historical Skepticism, and the Origins of Islam: A Critical Realist Evaluation of Seventh-Century Rock Inscriptions against the Space-Time Bedrock of the Promise-Plan
- Deconstructing the Standard Islamic Narrative
Explore This Topic
- Early Islam & Qurʾānic Origins
- Qurʾānic Manuscripts & Preservation
- Inscriptions, Geography & Early Institutions
Continue on Substack
Read the complete article on Substack, with Watch and Listen resources where available.
Leave a Reply